After Dinner Conversation - Philosophy | Ethics Short Story
Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Discussions/Audiobooks
"Appreciating Hate" by Deborah Serra
Preview
0:00
-2:43

"Appreciating Hate" by Deborah Serra

Is it possible to separate the art from the artist?

Hello everyone,

Up to now each story contained a link to listen to the podcast on the After Dinner Conversation website. Those stories were narrated by volunteers (myself included) and took so much time and effort to produce that we ended up abandoning that project a while back. However, narrator T. Jack Dansen has agreed to volunteer his time and amazing audio skills to pick up where we left off. We won’t be able to produce podcasts for every story going forward, but we’ll do what we can (I’ll fill in when possible). I hope you enjoy listening to his narration as much as I do.

T. Jack Dansen is a writer, musician, and app software developer. He enjoys hiking, cooking, and experiencing live music. Watch his video creations on the YouTube channel @AntHillOracle.

AWARDS:

  • Rated "Most Popular Fiction Magazine 2024" by Chill Subs

  • Rated "Top 10 LitMag of 2023, 2024" by Chill Subs

  • Rated #1 "The Very Best Literary Magazine" by Ranker

  • Rated “Top 50 Fiction" on Substack

NEWS:

Get 30 day free trial

Thanks for reading, sharing, and re-stacking this post!

Tina


Take the poll for this week’s story, “Appreciating Hate”:

(It’s completely anonymous…and fun!)

Loading...

Last week’s poll results:


man standing while holding burning book

Appreciating Hate by Deborah Serra

Narrated by T. Jack Dansen


Felix thought of his mind as though it were artwork – a painting. His skull was the frame, the canvas inside the frame was the grey matter, the applied paint was his education, and that insubstantial feeling evoked by the art piece was his consciousness. The fissure began as the tiniest slit in the fabric, but grew and then ripped across the entire surface of his mind. Finally, the only answer was restoration. He must repair his conscience. It was all no longer ignorable. He couldn’t deny it. He knew there was right. And there was wrong. He did not believe in moral relativity. Right. Wrong. It was clear.

He felt authorized to become proactive. There had to be rules. Art had to be held to some acceptable humane standard. Should it lift up, engage our spirits, fulfill, and vivify our lives? Maybe not. But should it honor the depraved, the cruel, the violent, and the heartless? Either he would act on what he knew to be right and true, or he would be complicit. So, the collecting began in earnest.

Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to After Dinner Conversation - Philosophy | Ethics Short Story to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.